Britain’s tabloid press is by turns rude, cruel, and funny. To politicians, it is often all three. As voters in the UK went to the polls on June 8, the newsstands offered strong support for Theresa May – and a picture of Jeremy Corbyn in a dustbin.
The prime minister’s political opponents took to social media during the campaign, urging young people to vote. The fact plenty of them seem to have done so may prove to be a factor in the shock result. If so, those social media messages are likely to have been a much greater influence than the slogans and insults of a printed press. Young people tend to read newspapers much less than their elders do.
Failure to understand the nature of change in business or politics leads to defeat, perhaps disaster. There are countless stories from the experience of the news media over the past two decades which bear witness to this. Technology has changed so many aspects of economic activity. Newspapers have suffered especially. Their two traditional forms of revenue – sales and advertising – no longer deliver anything like they once did.
Yet, despite their falling circulations, their political influence –real or imagined – has held up, particularly with older readers. In Britain, by tradition and regulation, the broadcast news media are supposed to strive for impartiality. It is across the editorial pages of the printed press that opinionated political journalism is allowed to run wild.
There are times – often election times – when papers offer praise and support. This has always been seen as the key to the door of 10 Downing Street – often to the frustration of that house’s occupant. In the 1930s, the Conservative prime minister, Stanley Baldwin, was fighting a battle with the press barons of that age over trade policy. Frustrated at the antics of the then owners of the Daily Mail and Daily Express, he said:
What the proprietorship of these papers is aiming at is power, but power without responsibility – the prerogative of the harlot through the ages.
Murdoch’s press monolith
Any prime minister since would probably agree. When that power, though, is allied to a political cause it favours, it has often been seen as decisive. Seeking to win an election for Labour in the 1990s, after almost two decades of Conservative government, Tony Blair famously flew half way around the world to meet Rupert Murdoch.
His reward was the support of Murdoch’s papers in the 1997 election campaign. It led to a Labour landslide. What a contrast to the previous election, in 1992. Then, The Sun mocked the Labour leader, Neil Kinnock, on polling day. When Kinnock’s substantial lead in the opinion polls failed to stand up in the voting booths, the paper crowed: “It was The Sun wot won it.”
Conventional wisdom ever since has held that you cannot win a UK election if Murdoch’s papers don’t back you. Journalism department seminar discussions often revolve around the real nature of Murdoch’s influence. Does he deliver votes, or are he and his editors just really good at guessing who will win, and picking that side to boost sales?
To an extent, though, this is beside the point. If politicians believe in the power of the press, then, in that sense at least, it is real.
Changing media landscape
Politicians’ choices have reflected the way the world has changed. David Cameron’s choice of Craig Oliver – a former TV news editor – to head his communications team in 2011 was cited as an example of Fleet Street’s waning importance.
All the same, it was the influence of the Daily Mail that reportedly came to worry Cameron in the run up to last year’s EU referendum. Reports earlier this year suggested that Cameron had tried to get the paper’s editor, Paul Dacre, sacked over his backing of Brexit.
But his successor in Number 10 has now learned that the support of Fleet Street’s big battalions was not enough. Despite the combination of their support for May and their rubbishing (literally, in the case of The Sun) of Corbyn, the Conservatives fell short of an overall majority.
In an age when so much more opinion is shared on social media, 2017 may well come to be seen as the election which ended the “Sun wot won it” era.
James Rodgers, Senior Lecturer in Journalism, City, University of London
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..