The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

Hacked Off: Even in its dying days the PCC covers up the Mail’s appalling code breach record

Daily MailNew monthly summaries of ‘concluded complaints’ have appeared on the PCC website, as usual with no fanfare and no analysis to help the public understand the performance of the newspapers that the PCC ‘regulates’.

So once again we have done the job for the first quarter of 2014, and the picture is a familiar one. The paper breaching the Code of Practice most often is the Daily Mail, whose editor Paul Dacre chairs the committee that writes the Code.

Here is the tally of the PCC rulings where it is clear there has been an actual or ‘probable’ breach of the Editors’ Code in January, February and March 2014.

Microsoft Word - Q1 2014 tables.docx

The Daily Mail tops the table by a country mile, with a third (33.3%) of all the breaches for national, Sunday and main regional newspapers.

The Mail is so far ahead of those other habitual offenders – its stablemate the Mail On Sunday (11.1%), The Daily Telegraph (8.3%) and The Sun (8.3%) – that it is practically a shoe-in for ‘Code Breacher Of The Year’ 2014 with nine months of 2014 left to play

It’s another familiar story when you examine the corporate results – the Daily Mail’s parent company has accounted for almost half of the breaches (47.2%) in the first three months of 2014, with News UK (13.9%) and Trinity Mirror taking third place with 12.5%.

And please remember two things about these figures.  First, no consequences flow from these cases for the newspapers or their journalists or editors: these are almost exclusively ‘mediated’ fudges of the kind the Leveson Report condemned.

And second, they undoubtedly represent only a fraction of newspaper wrongdoing, since relatively few people can now trust the PCC, which has been almost universally condemned and discredited.  It is certain that many complaints are simply not made because aggrieved people see no point.

Just as the PCC doesn’t publish league tables, so it rarely identifies the ‘most complained about’ stories, for fear of offending its paymasters and the editors that sit in judgment on the Editors’ Code Committee. It is clear, however, that one story generated a third of all the recorded complaints in Feb 2014: Richard Littlejohn’s inflammatory “Jolly Jihadi Boys’ Outing to Legoland” column in the Daily Mail.

Then, in March 2014, the public was appalled to see British newspapers – the Daily Mail, Daily Mirror and the Sun – intrude into the private grief of Mick Jagger following the tragic death of his partner L’Wren Scott. These stories triggered 63 complaints to the PCC, but as these were “third party” complaints (in other words, not from Jagger himself), the PCC are under no obligation to take the matter further with newspapers.

The PCC, you may recall, only reluctantly published their league table of the most complained about newspapers in 2013 after a dressing down from the Culture Select Committee – confirming our own earlier analysis and making a mockery of the Mail’s half-soaked damage limitation exercise.

1 Comment

  1. Julie Doughty

    I have been searching for any record of the current/recent rate of IPSO complaints received per newspaper. There are individual statements from publishers on the IPSO site and the list of rulings. However I can’t find that anyone has collated the sort of data in this Inforrm post on the PCC about which papers and which stories generate the most complaints. I’m looking for an indication only, nothing too scientific needed!
    If anyone knows where IPSO or anyone else publishes this, I’d be grateful.

Leave a Reply

© 2020 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑

%d bloggers like this: