The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

UK falls to Number 33 in global press freedom rankings – Amy O’Donoghue

WebFollowing government harassment of journalists and editors, the UK has fallen from number 29 to 33 on Reporters Without Borders’ annual World Press Freedom Index.

Reporters Without Borders (RWB) identified a decline in press freedom in the UK, due to the government’s response to publication by the Guardian newspaper of the intelligence files leaked by Edward Snowden, which exposed the mass surveillance programmes of US and UK intelligence agencies, the NSA and GCHQ.

The actions of the government in its attempt to silence the leaks has triggered an international outcry over the implications for a press freedom in the UK.

Frank La Rue, the UN special rapporteur on freedom of expression, noted in November that the government’s actions against the reporting of the leaks ‘is doing serious damage to the UK’s international reputation for investigative journalism and press freedom’. Dunja Mijatovic, representative for media freedom at the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, yesterday commented that, ’The continual accusations and attacks on the Guardian, their editor-in-chief and journalists by leading politicians is nothing but harassment and intimidation’.

The RWB report highlights the ‘disgraceful pressure’ the government has put on the Guardian newspaper which included questioning by the home affairs select committee of Guardian editor, Alan Rusbridger, concerning the paper’s handling of the leaked files. Scotland Yard, it has been reported, has also ‘assigned a squad of detectives to investigate the role of the Guardian newspaper in the Snowden affair’.

‘Both the US and UK authorities seem obsessed with hunting down whistleblowers instead of adopting legislation to rein in abusive surveillance practices that negate privacy’, the RWB report noted. This has stretched to the use of the Terrorism Act against David Miranda, partner and assistant to journalist Glenn Greenwald, who has worked with newspapers to publish the Snowden files. Miranda was detained by the Metropolitan Police at Heathrow airport for nine hours while travelling to Brazil with encrypted intelligence files. The basis for Miranda’s detention, the Metropolitan Police have stated, is that he was considered to be promoting a ‘political or ideological cause’.

Reporters Without Borders  has previously expressed concern for British journalist and Wikileaks editor Sarah Harrison, and has called for assurances from the government that Harrison ‘can return to her country safely’.

The recent actions on the part of the UK government serve to create a climate of fear and insecurity for journalists, and represent a direct attack on the independence of the press and journalists’ ability to operate freely.

Rather than standing behind the Guardian in its attempts to report on issues of vital public interest, much of the press has allied itself with government and security officials who wish to call a halt to the newspaper’s work.

An editorial in the Daily Mail, owned by Lord Rothermere, labelled the Guardian the ‘paper that helps Britain’s enemies’, while columnist for the Sun, Rod Liddle, posed the question, in an article headlined ‘Guardian treason helping terrorists’, ‘could a newspaper do anything worse?’

As the Leveson Inquiry revealed, a concentrated media results in a handful of powerful media groups with close ties to government, and little interest in producing important public interest journalism which holds those in power to account.

When the media excludes voices critical of the state and attacks journalists who dare to hold power to account, the ability of journalists to operate independently and without government oversight is at risk.

We need a free and open media capable of informing citizens of issues of public interest.

This post was published on the Media Reform Coalition Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks.


  1. Mike Sivier

    Reblogged this on Vox Political and commented:
    If anybody thinks Britain is the home of press freedom – think again! As a reporter I have seen this situation building and it is not in your interest, I promise you.

  2. Paul Smyth

    Reblogged this on The Greater Fool.

  3. Ronan

    Finland still sitting pretty at number one.

    Glad to see that defamation still being a criminal offence, with possible six-month prison sentences, or two-year sentences for aggravated defamation through the mass media, has no bearing on ranking.

    But I suppose Finland doesn’t prosecute defamation: just don’t read Ristamaki v. Finland (app. no. 66456/09, 2013), or ask the broadcast journalists hauled before the criminal courts for defaming a public figure during an investigative programme.

    And don’t read the Council of Europe’s study on defamation, where in Finland “the number of persecutions, convictions and fines imposed on media companies and journalists have reportedly increased in defamation cases over the past 10 years.”

  4. beastrabban

    Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
    This should concern everyone who cares about press freedom, whether they support the Guardian’s publication of Snowden’s revelations or not. The Coalition has consistently shown an extremely authoritarian attitude towards censorship and press freedom, and this affairs marks a continuing trend towards greater control of the press and speech. As for the attitude of the Right-wing newspapers, like the Daily Mail, who supported the government’s campaign against the Guardian, they can be compared to the Right-wing newspapers in Mussolini’s Italy and Nazi Germany that backed the regimes and voluntarily co-operated with them in censoring stories for the government.

  5. Ian Duncan

    Here’s a screen shot from the, um, left wing BBC:

    No censorship by omission there, then…

  6. untynewear

    Reblogged this on UNEMPLOYED IN TYNE & WEAR.

  7. #AceNewsGroup

    Reblogged this on Ace News Services 2014 and commented:
    #ANS2014 says `Honesty of what is written by press, is all that matters! Though l am still hoping and praying for that day!

    Ever the optimist! #press4truth

  8. Hugh Wallace

    Reblogged this on Are We Really Better Together? and commented:
    I’ve mentioned BBC bias in relation to reporting on the Scottish referendum and the latest EU elections have further illustrated the point. I stumbled over this blog today and the statistics that accompany it Be worried, very worried. We are not living in good times.

Leave a Reply

© 2023 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑

%d bloggers like this: