News, Exclusive: Carina Trimingham’s appeal against harassment ruling withdrawn

19 02 2013

Carina-Trimingham_2201220bCarina Trimingham has withdrawn the appeal in her harassment and privacy claim against the publisher of the Daily Mail. This was a matter of principle; brought because Carina and her legal team are convinced that the way the Daily Mail wrote about her, and in particular referred to her looks and her sexuality, was simply not acceptable.

Ms Trimingham made it clear that she had pursued this matter as far as she possibly could, but was not able to convince the Daily Mail to apologise for the hurt and distress they had caused her.  The appeal was withdrawn because it was no longer feasible for her to continue to fight a wealthy media company and to take the case to the Court of Appeal.  The appeal was dismissed with no order for costs.

The appeal was against a ruling by Mr Justice Tugendhat ([2012] EWHC 1296 (QB)) dismissing her claim for misuse of private information and harassment against Associated Newspapers, the publishers of the Daily Mail.   The Court of Appeal granted Ms Trimingham permission to appeal in September 2012 (see the Inforrm post) and the appeal was due to be heard on 12 or 13 March 2013.  It was dismissed by an order made on 18 February 2013.

As Eloise le Santo pointed out in a post in last month, the appeal raised important questions about Leveson and press harassment.  In granting permission to appeal on all grounds, Lord Justice Laws had noted that this was the first trial in England and Wales of a civil claim for harassment against a newspaper.

It had been argued on behalf of Ms Trimingham that the appeal had wider implications for journalists who wish to refer repeatedly, or in negative contexts, to a person’s characteristics, such as their sexuality or race, as well as those who are the subjects of such reporting.  The appeal in relation to the privacy claim involved an analysis of what circumstances make an individual a public person as oppose to a private person.  Ms Trimingham’s case was that she was a private individual albeit that she was in a relationship with Mr Huhne, who was a public person.   Her lawyers had argued that the case would

“ have significant ramifications as more and more people nowadays find themselves in the ‘public eye’. In his report Lord Justice Leveson urges the new press regulator to ‘equip itself to deal with complaints alleging discrimination’. He criticises the media’s representation of women and minorities and refers to prejudicial and pejorative references including of sexual orientation.  This appeal will analyse this point in depth and be important both in terms of the implications for publishers and could well provide guidance on how a new Code could be drafted.”

Now that the appeal has been withdrawn the examination of these important issues by the Court of Appeal will not now take place.



2 responses

25 02 2013
Law and Media Round Up – 25 February 2013 | Inforrm's Blog

[…] broke the news that Carina Trimingham had withdrawn the appeal in her harassment and privacy claim against the […]

25 03 2013
Carina Trimingham drops Appeal | Chop the Knot

[…] A post on the Inforrm blog, suggests that it was withdrawn for financial reasons which is a great shame. I’d like to think that her lawyers might have been willing to conduct the case on a conditional fee basis (and if they weren’t she should have called me!) but that alone is not enough. Conditional fees only work if there is insurance against liability for your opponent’s costs (or you are willing to take an enormous risk) and if the Daily Mail were lining up the big guns, their costs risked being very significant. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: