The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

Month: November 2012 (Page 3 of 7)

Ten myths about press abuse – Hugh Grant

Myth 1 – Only celebrities and politicians suffer at the hands of popular papers.

To an extent, we already know how false this is. There are victims like the Dowlers, like the families of the little girls murdered at Soham, like the families of soldiers killed in Afghanistan, like the victims of the London bombings. They were all identified as capable of making a commercial profit for certain newspapers, and therefore had their privacy invaded. Continue reading

News: Lord McAlpine receives a further £125,000 libel damages from ITV

The extraordinary story of Lord McAlpine’s libel settlements continues. The former Conservative Party Treasurer has settled his claims against Philip Schofield and ITV for £125,000. The claims arose out of  a “This Morning programme” broadcast on 8 November 2012 during which the presenter handed the prime minister a list of names of alleged abusers he had found on the internet. Continue reading

The Defamation Bill and a “Strong Public Interest Defence” – Hugh Tomlinson QC

Libel reform campaigners have long argued for the inclusion of a “strong public interest” defence in the Defamation Bill.   The current version of the Defamation Bill contains, in clause 4, a defence of “Responsible Publication in the Public Interest” – which is a codification of the common law “Reynolds” defence.  Although this is not wholly satisfactory it does, at least, focus attention on the need properly to investigate and verify allegations before publication. Continue reading

Journalisted weekly, week ending 18 November 2012, Lord McAlpine, Gaza violence and Congo rebels

Journalisted is an independent, not-for-profit website built to make it easier for the public, to find out more about journalists and what they write about. It is run by the Media Standards Trust. It collects information automatically from the websites of British news outlets. Articles are indexed by journalist, based on the byline to the article. Keywords and statistics are automatically generated, and the site searches for any blogs or social bookmarking sites linking to each article. Continue reading

Case Law, Australia, Trkulja v Google Inc, $200,000, Second Big Win to Send Google into a Frenzy – Justin Castelan

In Silicon Valley, Google’s legal representatives will now be reinventing their business models, acquainting themselves with Australian defamation law and generally wincing, as for what seems to be the first time, a common law court has determined that, for the purposes of defamation, Google can be treated as a publisher of its search engine results. Continue reading

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑