The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

Month: February 2012 (Page 6 of 6)

News: Leveson Inquiry, Week 9 – The PCC, regulators, investigators and a victim – Natalie Peck

It was a busy week at the Leveson Inquiry as the chairman continued to ruminate on the future of press regulation. Representatives from the PCC, and from various regulators. private investigators’ organisations and mobile phone companies gave evidence to the inquiry. The final witness Baroness Hollins provided a timely reminder of why the inquiry had been set up in the first place. Continue reading

Leveson Round Up: A New Compact for the Press? – Damian Tambini

Push came to shove this week in Court 73. The UK newspaper industry outlined to the Leveson Inquiry the initial proposals of its last-ditch pitch for reform of self-regulation. The press, understandably, want to retain some control over their regulation, and Lord Hunt, as chair of the Press Complaints Commission revealed that newspaper publishers offered him a ‘blank sheet of paper’ on which to develop proposals to save self-regulation. Continue reading

Case Law: Růžový Panter, OS v Czech Republic: Anti-Corruption NGO defamation case, no violation of Article 10

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section) decided yesterday that there was no violation of Article 10 as a result of a defamation judgment against a Czech anti-corruption NGO, “Pink Panther”.  The case of Růžový Panter, OS v. Czech Republic (App No 20240/08)(available only in French) arose out of a press release concerning a widely publicised case concerning tax evasion in relation to light heating oils (called “LTO”).  The press release asked a number of questions in relation to the case. Continue reading

Case Law: Coogan and Phillips v NGN – give a thought to the under-privileged – Kirsten Sjovoll

The Court of Appeal today dismissed Mr Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against an order that he provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation ([2012] EWCA Civ 48).  The Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination (“PSI”). Continue reading

Newer posts »

© 2026 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders Norén — Up ↑