The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

Tag: Truth

Case Law: Rodoy v Optical Express, Court finds claimant who lacked remorse for historic scam is still a fraudster – Adham Harker

Optical Express accused of 'character assassination' against consumer rights activistThe judgment in Rodoy v Optical Express Limited [2026] EWHC 1219 (KB) is a fascinating one – despite running to 411 paragraphs and over 40,000 words.  Ms Rodoy operates a website and various social media groups/accounts called ‘Optical Express Ruined My Life’ (‘OERML’), which warns of the dangers of laser eye surgery.  That is despite never having been a customer of Optical Express. Continue reading

News: Noel Clarke loses libel claim against the Guardian, defences of truth and public interest succeed

Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim | The IndependentJudgment was, today, handed down in the libel case of Noel Clarke v Guardian News and Media [2025] EWHC 2193 (KB).  In a 224 page, 1023 paragraph judgment, Mrs Justice Steyn dismissed all Mr Clarke’s claims.  She found that Mr Clarke was not a “credible or reliable witness” [128] and the defences of truth and public interest were successful. Continue reading

The truth, pure and simple, as a defence to defamation claims after Depp v NGN in England and Ireland – Eoin O’Dell

The truth, as Oscar Wilde has Algernon Moncrieff remark to Jack Worthing in Act I of The Importance of Being Ernest, is rarely pure and never simple. Nowhere is this more evident than in a defamation courtroom. At common law, the defence of justification to a claim for defamation averred that the words complained of, in their natural and ordinary meaning, were true in substance and in fact. Continue reading

Defamation Act 2013: A summary and overview six years on, Part 1, Sections 1 to 3 – Brett Wilson LLP

The Defamation Act 2013 (‘the Act’) came into force on 1 January 2014.  At the time, we published an article considering the individual provisions of the Act, and speculating about how the law of defamation had been changed.  In this follow-up article, we revisit the topic six years after the Act’s inception and look at what has happened in practice. This post deals with sections 1 to 3. The remainder of the Act will be considered in Part 2. Continue reading

© 2026 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑