In his Report Lord Justice Leveson considered and rejected a proposal that there should be a statutory right of reply or correction. This was a proposal made by the Media Regulation Roundtable in its evidence to the Inquiry [pdf]. His reasons for rejecting this proposal are unconvincing. An important opportunity has been missed. Read the rest of this entry »
Revisited: Was Leveson wrong to reject a statutory right of reply? – Mark Thomson
29 12 2013Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Human Rights, Mark Thomson, Right of Reply
Categories : Leveson Inquiry, Media Regulation
Was Leveson wrong to reject a statutory right of reply? – Mark Thomson
27 01 2013
In his Report Lord Justice Leveson considered and rejected a proposal that there should be a statutory right of reply or correction. This was a proposal made by the Media Regulation Roundtable in its evidence to the Inquiry [pdf]. Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : 3 Comments »
Tags: Article 10, Mark Thomson, Media Regulation Roundtable, Right of Reply
Categories : Leveson Inquiry, Media
