The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

Tag: Jacob Rowbottom

What role will broadcasting law continue to play in elections? – Jacob Rowbottom

In recent elections, the legal framework for regulating campaigns has come under considerable strain. The rules were built around a system in which national campaign communications were mainly carried through the broadcast and print media. The last comprehensive reform of election finance law was enacted in 2000. The framework left a number of old problems unresolved, such as the role of big donors. Continue reading

Beyond publication offences: informal censorship and the chain of communication – Jacob Rowbottom

Various legal controls that are imposed on publishers provide a central focus in the study of media law. When teaching the subject, the core topics on the syllabus look at the liability of publishers in criminal law and tort law. These controls remain significant, but there appears to be a declining use of this method of control in some areas of law. Last year, when writing an article about the law of obscenity, Continue reading

A surprise ruling? Strasbourg upholds the ban on paid political ads on TV and Radio – Jacob Rowbottom

animaldefendersThe European Court of Human Rights has given its decision in Animal Defenders International, holding that the ban on political advertising on the broadcast media does not violate Article 10. I had been convinced that the Strasbourg Court, following earlier decisions in cases involveing Switzerland and Norway, would come to the opposite conclusion – but I am relieved that they did not. Continue reading

Leveson, the Press and the Separation of Powers – Jacob Rowbottom

jacob.rowbottomLast Friday I heard Lord Hoffmann give the annual Neill lecture in Oxford, talking about the separation of powers. One of his points was that there had been too much fuss about the ‘breaches’ of the separation of powers that existed prior to the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Lord Hoffmann argued that the old role of the Lord Chancellor sitting in Cabinet did not threaten judicial independence. Continue reading

© 2023 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑