The Cambridge University Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law is holding its Spring Conference on the subject of “Intermediary Liability and Responsibility” on Saturday 10 March 2017. Read the rest of this entry »
Data Protection and Intermediary liability: how do the French do it? – Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
24 04 2017
While the scope of intermediary liability exemptions is being discussed in several places around Europe (and beyond), it is interesting to go back to the Overblog legal saga, which a few years ago had been described by some as pre-announcing other popular sagas, such as the infamous Google Spain case (discussed in a previous post here). Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: Intermediary Liability, Peep Beep!, Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
Categories : Data Protection, France
The GDPR, the proposed Copyright Directive and intermediary liability: one more time! – Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
16 03 2017
A lot has been written on the topic of intermediary liability in the past few months. But has everything been said or read? And looking at the different pieces of the regulatory jigsaw together, are we heading in the right direction? Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : 2 Comments »
Tags: Intermediary Liability, Peep Beep!, Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
Categories : Data Protection, EU
Liability and responsibility: new challenges for Internet intermediaries – Monica Horten
23 10 2016
How might policy-makers address demands for removal or policing of Internet content? Starting in the spring of 2016, a suite of proposals has emerged from the European Commission regarding Internet intermediaries and liability for content. Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Intermediary Liability, Monica Horten
Categories : Freedom of expression, Government and Policy
Ireland: Internet defamation and the liability of intermediaries (Muwema v Facebook Part 1) – Eoin O’Dell
28 09 2016
The liability of internet intermediaries for defamatory posts on their platforms was central to the decision of Binchy J in Muwema v Facebook Ireland Ltd [2016] IEHC 519 (23 August 2016). A Ugandan lawyer objected to allegedly defamatory posts on a pseudonymous Facebook account, and Binchy J gave an order requiring Facebook to identify the account-holder. Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: Cearta.ie, Eoin O'Dell, Intermediary Liability, Internet
Categories : Ireland, Libel
Responsible Communication by Internet Intermediaries – Marcelo Thompson
2 08 2016
In debates concerning Internet intermediary liability, an often-expressed view is that intermediaries (such as Facebook and Google) shouldn’t be turned into adjudicators, who reason and decide about the legal or illegal nature of content they host, and thus about whether or not to take such content down. But is that a plausible view? Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Intermediary Liability, LSE. Media Policy Project, Marcelo Thompson
Categories : Legal, Social Media
Policy Debates over EU Platform Liability Laws: New Human Rights Case Law in the Real World – Daphne Keller
24 04 2016
This is the last of four posts on the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECHR) rulings in Delfi v. Estonia and MTE v. Hungary. In both cases, national courts held online news portals liable for comments posted by their users – even though the platforms did not know about the comments. Those rulings effectively required platforms to monitor and delete users’ online expression in order to avoid liability. Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Center for Internet and Society, Daphne Keller, Delfi, Intermediary Liability
Categories : Freedom of expression, Human Rights, Legal, Social Media
Litigating Platform Liability in Europe: New Human Rights Case Law in the Real World – Daphne Keller
22 04 2016
This is the third of four posts on the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECHR) rulings in Delfi v. Estonia and MTE v. Hungary. In both cases, national courts held online news portals liable for comments posted by their users – even though the platforms did not know about them. Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : 1 Comment »
Tags: Center for Internet and Society, Daphne Keller, Intermediary Liability
Categories : Freedom of expression, Human Rights, Legal, Media, Social Media
Policing online comments in Europe: New Human Rights Case in the Real World – Daphne Keller
21 04 2016
This is the second of four posts on real-world consequences of the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECHR) rulings in Delfi v. Estonia and MTE v. Hungary. Both cases arose from national court rulings that effectively required online news portals to monitor users’ speech in comment forums. Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Center for Internet and Society, Daphne Keller, Intermediary Liability
Categories : Freedom of expression, Human Rights, Social Media
New Intermediary Liability from the Court of Human Rights, What will they mean in the real world? – Daphne Keller
19 04 2016
Last summer, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a serious setback to free expression on the Internet. The Court held, in Delfi v. Estonia, that a government could compel a news site to monitor its users’ online comments about articles. Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Center for Internet and Society, Daphe Keller, Intermediary Liability
Categories : Caselaw, Human Rights, Legal, Social Media
