Richard’s many interests invariably blossomed into expertise – from fine wine (his cellar matched his knowledge), to the dry fly of choice for testing conditions, to Mozart’s life and works. His chosen area of the law, the law of defamation with its unending search for the civilised balance between the right to reputation and freedom of expression in an ever-evolving social context, was no exception. His natural leaning may have been towards the latter. Continue reading



David Hooper, now retired from practice as a media lawyer, but who has certainly not lost his touch for adventure, has written a good book about some bad people. These are people who have used their financial might with the assistance of some greedy lawyers to stop the truth from getting into the public domain.
Press freedom is once again in peril, according to right-wing newspapers. As part of a mass offensive recalling the heady days of reaction to the Leveson Inquiry into the culture, practices, and ethics of the British press following the phone-hacking scandal, an editorial in the Mail on 28 November boomed that freedom of the press is a “democratic necessity” and among the “precious institutions and freedom which must not be compromised at any price” – while Charles Moore warned in the Telegraph on 24 November that “the nationalisation of a British national newspaper seems possible”.
A pivotal court
It has been 

