The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

Category: United States (Page 3 of 19)

Of stalking horses and dogs that did not bark: 303 Creative LLC v Elenis, standards of review, commercial speech, and the end of the beginning of the modern First Amendment

web designThe opinion of Gorsuch J for the US Supreme Court in 303 Creative LLC v Elenis 600 US (2023) (Opinion (pdf) | Justia) has been widely welcomed on the US political right as a victory religious rights and just as broadly deplored on the US political left as a defeat for LGBTQ+ rights. Many on both sides agree, however, that – either way – it is an important defence of free speech. I am sorry to say that it is nothing of the sort. It is a stalking horse for an approach that will have pernicious consequences for the First Amendment. Continue reading

Should governments ban TikTok? Can they? A cybersecurity expert explains the risks the app poses and the challenges to blocking it – Doug Jacobson

On May 17, 2023, Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte signed legislation banning TikTok in the state. The law imposes fines of US$10,000 per day on any app store that offers the popular Chinese-owned video social media app, and on the app maker itself if it operates in the state. Individual users are not subject to penalties. Continue reading

The Relationship Between Fox News and the Republican Party Undermines the First Amendment and is Poisoning American Democracy – Eliza Bechtold

Dominion’s defamation lawsuit against Fox News offers unprecedented access to internal discussions at the network regarding its coverage of false narratives disseminated by Donald Trump and his enablers regarding the integrity of the 2020 election that formed part of a broader conspiracy to overturn the results of the election, culminating in the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. Continue reading

The US Supreme Court could change the Internet as we know it – Chantal Joris

20) Live updates: Supreme Court hears Twitter v. Taamneh oral argumentsThis week, the Supreme Court heard arguments in two cases – Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh – that have the potential to fundamentally change how social media companies recommend and moderate content. Both cases will impact the scope of Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act which shields internet platforms from liability for content posted on their platforms. Section 230 is viewed by many as one of the foundations of internet freedom. Continue reading

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders Norén — Up ↑