The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

Category: Open Justice (Page 1 of 12)

The Case of Yang Tengbo: Anonymity Orders and Open Justice in a Digital Age – Cordelia Drew

Who is Yang Tengbo? What we know about the Chinese 'spy' with links to  Prince Andrew | UK News | Sky NewsThe recent judgment by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (‘SIAC’) granting the media partial access to information in the case of H6 vs Secretary of State for the Home Department (SC/205/2023) has reignited debate about open justice and press scrutiny. The application to access the court documents is the latest in a series of challenges faced by the media when reporting on this contentious case. Continue reading

Anonymisation of civil judgments: a routine failure to follow open justice rules – Paul Magrath

A statistical analysis of the civil High Court judgments published in 2023 showed that, out of 116 cases where one or more parties had been anonymised, 67 (or nearly 60%) did not have a corresponding anonymisation order published on the Judiciary website. While around half of these (34) did make some reference to anonymity or reporting restrictions in the judgment itself, the remainder (33) made no such reference. Continue reading

Brianna Ghey’s Murder: Unpacking Transphobia, Offender Anonymity, and the Impact of Sentencing Remarks – Dimitris Akrivos and Alexandros Antoniou

Brianna Ghey: How teenagers with a 'thirst for death and murder' plotted killing on their phones | UK News | Sky NewsThe death of 16-year-old Brianna Ghey at Culcheth Linear Park in February 2023 sent shockwaves across the United Kingdom. On 20 December 2023, Scarlett Jenkinson and Eddie Ratcliffe were found guilty of Brianna’s murder, subsequently receiving life imprisonment sentences on 2 February 2024. Continue reading

The practical reality of open justice and what can be done: reflections on the Justice Committee’s new report, Part One – Judith Townend

Justice Policy Series, Part II: Open JusticeOver the past few years – especially in the first year of COVID-19 and the emergency move to remote proceedings – it was frustrating to witness bold claims about the provision of access to court hearings and reporters’ rights when the evidence on the ground was that reporters and other observers were having difficulties entering courts and accessing virtual hearings. Continue reading

The law governing the reporting of financial remedy proceedings in the family courts: where are we? Part 2 – Godwin Busuttil

On 1 November 2021, three days after the publication of the President’s Report on Transparency, Mostyn J handed down judgment in a case called BT v CU [2021] EWFC 87; [2022] 1 WLR 1349. This has turned out to be the first in a series of six judgments in which Mostyn J has rewritten the rules governing the reporting of financial remedies cases in the family courts described in Part One of this article. Continue reading

« Older posts

© 2025 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑