The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

Category: Human Rights (Page 1 of 44)

News: Associated Newspapers partly successful in Human Rights claim concerning CFAs

The Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights today handed down judgment in the case of Associated Newspapers v United Kingdom (App No 37398/21).   It was claimed that success fees and ATE premiums under CFA’s violated the newspapers Article 10 right to freedom of express.  It was held that success fees did violate Article 10 but there was no violation in relation to recoverable ATE premiums. Continue reading

Case Law, Strasbourg: Sokolovskiy v Russia, Criminal Conviction for Religious ‘Hate Speech’ violated the right to freedom of expression of a blogger – Dirk Voorhoof

1. – Introduction

In its judgment of 4 June 2024 in the case of Sokolovskiy v. Russia the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) dealt with the issue of religious hate speech as a criminal offence interfering with the right to freedom of expression and information under Article 10 ECHR (see also Lenis v. Greece and Tagiyev and Huseynov v. Azerbaijan). Continue reading

Case Law, Strasbourg: Bild GmbH & Co v Germany, Police officer’s “pixelation” injunction violated Article 10 – Hugh Tomlinson KC

A man reads Germany's top-selling In the case of Bild GmbH v Germany [2023] ECHR 851 the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights found that an order that a publisher should cease publication of CCTV footage of an arrest without pixelating the face of one of the officers involved was a violation of Article 10 as it could lead to an unacceptable ban on future publication on matters of public interest. Continue reading

Case Law, Strasbourg: Lenis v Greece, Extreme Homophobia not protected under freedom of expression – Tobias Mortier

Hate speech and violence against LGBTQI+ individuals are on the rise in Europe. In 2022, ILGA Europe reported an increase in both the number of cases of violence, as well as in their severity. As for hate speech, this was by no means limited to furtive cases; politicians in several countries (including Belgium) reportedly made numerous derogatory or hateful public statements concerning LGBTQI+ persons. Continue reading

Hurbain v Belgium: Navigating the Intersection of Privacy and Press Freedom in the Digital Age – Harriet Ní Chinnéide

What is document archiving? - QuoraIn the wake of the digital revolution, questions surrounding the right to privacy and the right to be forgotten have come to the fore. With the digitalisation of press archives, what once required extensive archival research can now be discovered – even sometimes accidentally – through a simple online search. This is what led the Belgian Courts to order that Mr Hurbain anonymise an article in the online archive of the Le Soir newspaper. Before the European Court of Human Rights (the Court, ECtHR) Mr Hurbain argued that this order had violated his right to freedom of expression. Continue reading

Case Summary, Strasbourg: Sanchez v France, Grand Chamber confirms decision that criminal conviction for hate speech does not violate Article 10 – Dirk Voorhoof

On 15 May 2023 in the case of Sanchez v France, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) confirmed its earlier Chamber judgment of 2 September 2021 (see Inforrm post here). The ECtHR found that the criminal conviction of a politician for failing to promptly delete hate speech, that was posted by others, from his public Facebook account, did not violate Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Continue reading

« Older posts

© 2025 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑