The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

Month: June 2024 (Page 1 of 2)

Law and Media Round Up – 24 June 2024

On 20 June 2024, the Supreme Court handed down judgement in the case of Mueen-Uddin v SSHD [2024] UKSC 21. The defamation claim concerned a 2019 report titled ‘Challenging Hateful Extremism’, which was published by the Home Office, and contained a footnote referring to the Appellant’s conviction by the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) in Bangladesh for crimes against humanity. The claimant has always denied the allegations and was convicted in absentia without the possibility of appeal. The High Court struck out the claim as an abuse of process, and the Court of Appeal upheld the decision in [2022] EWCA Civ 1073. Continue reading

Will Lewis and The Washington Post: ‘Real Journalists Don’t Ignore the Failings of Their Own Industry the Way the UK Press Does’ – Brian Cathcart

Will Lewis may not be a well-known name in the UK, but he is getting to be quite famous in the United States, if not in a good way. He is a journalist and, in fact, he is really Sir Will Lewis, since he received a knighthood last year in Boris Johnson’s resignation honours list. You can tell a lot from that. Continue reading

Canada: Anti-SLAPP Report, Analysis of 2023 decisions in Ontario and British Columbia

The well known Canadian media lawyer Ryder Gilliland has produced a comprehensive report analysing 37 decisions on anti-SLAPP motions in 2023 in the courts of Ontario and British Columbia.  His goal is to provide insight into how motions under anti-SLAPP legislation in Ontario and British Columbia are being adjudicated. The report examines macro trends (such as the number of successful anti-SLAPP motions), as well as micro trends (such as which elements of the statutory test are most often met). Continue reading

Law and Media Round Up – 17 June 2024

On12 June 2024  the Supreme Court handed down the long-awaited judgement in the case of George v Cannell  [2024] UKSC 19. The issues before the court were (i) whether a claimant is required to demonstrate financial loss to establish liability under s3(1) of the Defamation Act 1952 in a claim for malicious falsehood; and (ii) whether a claimant who establishes liability can recover damages for injury to feelings arising from the falsehood, even where no financial loss occurred. Continue reading

« Older posts

© 2024 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑