The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

Month: October 2023 (Page 2 of 3)

Case Law: Aaronson v Stones: Libel Trial, truth and the perils of tacking on a public interest defence – Floyd Alexander-Hunt

On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). The Judge found for the claimant Jack Aaronson, an adult entertainment entrepreneur, in a libel claim against the defendant Marcus Stones, a former adult entertainer, who had published several tweets and featured in a YouTube video alleging the claimant was a serial rapist. Continue reading

Law and Media Round Up – 16 October 2023

On 16  October 2023, Steyn J will hear applications in the case of Donald Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence.  The former President contends that the so-called “Steele Dossier” produced by the defendant breached his data protection rights.  The defendant has applied to strike out the claim as an abuse of the process.  The New York Times has a full report.  There are also reports in the Guardian and the Independent. Continue reading

Dark patterns: how online companies strive to keep your money and data when you try to leave – Richard Whittle and Stuart Mills

Have you signed up to an online service for a free trial, decided it isn’t for you, but still ended up paying for it months – or even years – later? Or tried cancelling a subscription, and found yourself giving up during the painstaking process? If so, there’s a good chance you have encountered a “dark pattern”. Continue reading

Unmasking Banksy: the street artist is not one man but a whole brand of people – Tyson Mitman

The graffiti artist known as Banksy might be unmasked in an upcoming defamation case over his use of Instagram to invite shoplifters to go to a Guess store because it had used his imagery without permission. The case could be seen as an attempt to force Banksy to relinquish his anonymity, which, many say, has been important to his success over the years. Continue reading

Case Law: Blake v Fox: Racist, Paedophile, fact or opinion? – Floyd Alexander-Hunt

On 25 August 2023, the Court of Appeal Nicola Davies, Arnold and Warby LJJ) handed down judgment in Blake & ors v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000. The Court dismissed an appeal against Nicklin J’s findings in the High Court in respect to the natural and ordinary meaning of five (out of six) tweets regarding accusations of racism and paedophilia ([2022] EWHC 3542 (KB)). This libel case provides useful analysis for distinguishing statements of fact from opinion and is a cautionary reminder against grouping statements together when there are multiple claimants. Continue reading

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑