The International Forum for Responsible Media Blog

Month: September 2011 (Page 5 of 6)

McCanns, Max Mosley and newspaper groups apply to be core participants in Leveson Inquiry – Thais Portilho-Shrimpton

Newspaper groups, phone hacking victims, the former News International chief executive, police and politicians were amongst those who have applied for core participant status at the Leveson Inquiry today.

They made their submissions to Lord Justice Leveson in court 76 of the Royal Courts of Justice this morning (Tuesday, 6 September 2011). Continue reading

Opinion: “The Jefferies Contempt Case – Opening a can of worms?” – Alex Bailin QC

In July this year, The Mirror and The Sun newspapers were fined £50,000 and £18,000 respectively by the Divisional Court for strict liability contempt under s.2 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 for the “vilification” of Christopher Jefferies, who had been arrested for the murder of his former tenant Joanna Yeates. He had been released without charge shortly after his arrest but whilst he was the subject of investigation “extreme” material had been published about him by both newspapers including  suggestions that “he was linked to both … paedophile offences and … [an] earlier murder offence”. The case was unusual and raises as many question as it answers. Continue reading

News: Judgments released in Doncaster Metropolitan BC v Haigh, the Hemming Injunction case

On 22 August 2011 the President of the Family Division, Sir Nicholas Wall (pictured), gave two judgments in cases involving Vicky Haigh, who had been named in the House of Commons by John Hemming MP on 26 April 2011, on a point of order.  We have previously posted about these judgments and about some of the background.   The two judgments are now available on the invaluable Bailii site. Continue reading

Opinion: “Courts and Controversy – consequences of the Jefferies contempt case” – Brian Cathcart

Brian Cathcart The UK press may show more restraint in reporting of high-profile cases if contempt laws are vigorously enforced, says Brian Cathcart.

The next time there is a sensational murder — something on the scale of the Ipswich or Soham cases — you may notice something different about the media coverage. Reporters may show restraint of a kind that is not familiar. In fact, they might actually obey the law.

Continue reading

Case Law: Baglow v. Smith: Removing the Defamatory Sting From Online Debates on Blogs and Message Boards – Matthew Nied

On 30 August 2011 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the case of Baglow v. Smith, 2011 ONSC 5131. The decision suggests that an allegedly defamatory statement made in a debate on a blog or internet forum may not be found to be defamatory if the plaintiff previously engaged in the debate but did not respond to the statement despite having the opportunity to do so. Continue reading

Opinion: “The PCC rearranges the deckchairs” – Brian Cathcart

It will probably surprise many people — I wish I could say it surprised me — to know that the Press Complaints Commission still thinks it has a future. If recent weeks have taught us anything about the PCC, you might think, it is that the so-called regulator has failed to uphold press standards and a new approach is needed. The prime minister thinks so, Labour thinks so, the public thinks so and the Leveson inquiry has been asked to Continue reading

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Inforrm's Blog

Theme by Anders Norén — Up ↑